Spoiler alert: contains plot hints.
Does anyone do it better than Susan Hill? Give
her a remote house, a graveyard, an attic with an iron-framed bed, some bad
weather, circling birds and a childless mother or a motherless child and she’ll
give you three hundred pages of expert ghastliness. Dead or ghostlike children,
live or lifelike dolls, mirrors that reveal a true face, unjustly buried things
trying to get out, unfairly banished things trying to get in, cots and rocking
chairs that rock themselves, dead people who’ve lost something returning to
look for it… we know what world we’re in.
Hill’s versatility as a literary novelist is
well-known but there is a special, chilly pocket of appreciation reserved for
her ghost stories The Man in the Picture, The Small Hand, The Mist in the
Mirror and perhaps the most famous of all, The Woman in Black, which is onstage
and onscreen as well as on the page.
Here’s an indiscreet anecdote from a namedropping
writer colleague: “I’m friends with Susan Hill. If you’re worried about money,
get a play on. The Woman in Black’s been showing for ever and Susan was telling
me it makes so much money she doesn’t know what to do with it.”
Dolly is a long short story, beautifully
presented as a black and green pocket hardback by Profile books. It performs
the same clever Halloween trick as Hill’s other works, taking all the staples
of historic horror and ghost genres and delivering something that is completely
predictable, symmetrical and seemingly obvious. Yet it is Hill’s storytelling
skill itself that makes these stories seem like they’ve been around forever and
are part of some deep national dread.
Here’s a comment from another colleague, a
brilliant writer to whom I was praising Dolly but wondering why we need an old
house and no Net for a proper horror story:
“We need to strip away the modern for true horror because technology isn’t frightening,” she said.
“We need to strip away the modern for true horror because technology isn’t frightening,” she said.
“A literary editor once said to me, ‘No-one
wants to read about people texting,’” I said.
“Well – screens might be frightening,
people climbing out of them or going into them.”
“Like that Japanese film, The Ring.”
“But what’s really frightening is people.”
“Or things behaving like people, or bad
people pretending to be good people and getting away with it. Or wearing a mask
in full view. Have you read the Freud essay, The Truth of Masks? It’s about how
disguises are real. We choose the disguise that we think hides us, but we
subconsciously choose the thing that reveals our true face.”
“…Or people pretending to be people you
know. I once received a lovely letter from a young reader – I write for
children – and she told me one of her most horrible dreams. She told me there
was someone in her room, and she thought it was her mother. It looked like her
mother. And she got close to it and suddenly it said, ‘I’m not your mother.’
And then, the girl wrote, ‘She took me to her cold dark nest.’ Isn’t that the
phrase? ‘Cold dark nest.’ She was a writer’s daughter of course, her mother’s a
writer, it starts so young.”
In Dolly, two children go to stay at an old
house inhabited by a sullen housekeeper and a well-meaning but distant aunt.
One child is a diffident and uninteresting little boy, who narrates the story
as a grown-up. The other is a fiery, spoilt, unhappy girl whose flighty,
frivolous (etc) mother has abandoned her. This girl, Leonora, wants a doll for
her birthday. She doesn’t get the one she wants, expresses her rage in a
jarringly ugly and ungrateful manner, and then…. There are no thrills or spills
with Dolly, merely a momentary act of crude brattishness which is quickly
forgotten by the young perpetrator but punished cruelly for decades afterwards
by …well… and revealed with implacable, predictable (but no less affecting)
calmness.
Dolly is about consequences, about the real
monster not being the person or thing you thought it was, about the punishment
being much greater than the crime and unfairly and disproportionately affecting
many more people than just the perpetrator. It’s about the suffering of
innocents and sometimes their revenge. The suffering comes out in twos: there
are the two original children, each of whom has a daughter, and there are not
one but two dolls, and there may be two or more perpetrators, and two of them
might be the dolls – or maybe the dolls are merely reflecting the malice of
Fate or the bitterness and pique of a grown adult who’s been hurt – or maybe
it’s a very hard lesson that little girls shouldn’t misbehave….
At once frozen and hokey, underpowered yet
overbaked, perverse yet obvious, smooth and inexorable, it’s also horribly
satisfying. Yet the underlying (and I am sure, subconscious) politics of the
story leave a bad impression. Though narrated by a male character, the story is
about the nastiness, pettiness, malice and punishing of females, who are the perpetrators
of most of the bad events in the book, but for one very significant act at the
beginning; and the victims of this female malice are all very young girls
themselves, almost babies. The flighty mother who abandons Leonora, the shrewd
housekeeper who diagnoses Leonora on sight as evil – “She had looked into
Leonora’s eyes when she had first arrived, and seen the devil there”, Leonora
the malicious child herself, the childless aunt who seems kind but may not be,
the changing female dolls who cause or mimic the suffering of the little girls
and grow ugly in their boxes like “a wizened old woman, a crone” in one case
and “no longer a beauty… a pariah” in another. The worst thing that is said of
Leonora is that “she is too like her mother” – a bad girl taking after a bad
woman – and the insult is delivered by another woman, the aunt, Leonora’s
mother’s own sister. We are not only in an Edwardian physical setting but also its
psychology: whether real or mannequins, young or old, absent or present, females
are sad, mad, bad, petty, shrill, vicious, shrewish, irresponsible, occult,
corrupt and corrupting.
If your desire to revel in the nastiness of
Woman is satisfied and you want some racial and national stereotypes as a side
dish then look no further than the Eastern European city the narrator visits as
an adult. The medieval Old Town is in the middle, surrounded by hastily
over-developed malls and motorways, the building work halted following a
people’s revolution and the exile of the state leader. In the Old Town is… you
can finish this sentence for me… a little old toy shop, and in the little old toy shop is
a little old toy-restorer… “a very small old man” with an inscrutable manner and
“a jeweller’s glass screwed into one eye”, from a Quality Street advert at
Christmas, who seems to know exactly what the narrator is looking for.
If the Grimm climate of Eastern European
cultural clichés is too chilly for you then let’s go to India – that palace of
clichés! - with the narrator and his family, to a region which Hill does not
even bother to give a name to, instead sketching it with a series of offhand, inexact,
thrown-out and embarrassingly crude and ignorant pejoratives: “heat and
humidity…extreme poverty” amongst “women and their children in a remote
village, where there were no medical facilities and where clothes and people
were washed in the great river that flowed through the area.” Tiny hint: there
is no such thing as a remote village on the banks of a great river. If there’s
a great river, it’s not a remote village but has the provision for irrigation
for centuries of agriculture and therefore crops, food, flora and fauna; a
prime position along an established transport route; a longstanding and
probably classic trade route and the possibility of (to-be-purified) drinking
water. Another hint: If you do not know a country, culture or people well,
particularly one that was a former colony and subject to any number of racist
clichés and Orientalist justifications, don’t patronise it with uneducated
generalisations. Write about something you know and respect instead. Want more,
reader? How about “terrible diseases… ravage this beautiful country. Poor
sanitation, contaminated water, easy spread of infection…” easy and glib, just
like that.
Dolly is a smoothly gut-churning story from
one of England’s greatest living writers. From its lonely starting point it
soon widens into an exploration of the depth and ineffability of curses.
However, it leaves a bitter taste as much for its racial stereotypes and tinge
of sexual slander as its sensational storytelling and core of fatalistic
horror.
Dolly by Susan Hill is published by ProfileBooks.